01
Intake
Open Requests
98
+12%
vs prior 7d
Mar 31Apr 03Apr 06
The AI-Powered Solution ForProperty Maintenance Operations
RequestHawk gives property teams an AI-driven system for maintenance intake, vendor coordination, approvals, scheduling, and closeout without the usual operational drag.
Dashboard
Internal User/Owner/Workspace
R
RequestHawk User
Owner / demo-tenant
Command center
Internal operations dashboard
A tighter view of workflow load, today's schedule, and the queues that still need action.
Owner / Service Operatordemo-tenant
Workflow
At-a-glance load
7d30d90d
02
Approval
Pending Approvals
23
+19%
vs prior 7d
Mar 31Apr 03Apr 06
03
Execution
Active Work Orders
87
+13%
vs prior 7d
Mar 31Apr 03Apr 06
04
Billing
Invoices Ready
41
+16%
vs prior 7d
Mar 31Apr 03Apr 06
Today
Appointments
Total
38
Confirmed
31
Completed
12
Remaining
26
26 field appointments remain today, with teams dispatched across 18 active properties.
Open scheduleBusiness
Performance snapshot
Visible Properties
284
12 organizations in view
Visible Vendors
312
194 preferred vendors
Pending Approvals
23
23 total approvals in view
Export-Ready Invoices
41
41 invoices ready for delivery
Queue
Requests needing attention
RecordContextDueStatus
REQ-1842Westgate / Plumbing leakTodayTriage
REQ-1839Harbor Point / HVAC outage1dApproval
REQ-1831Cedar Grove / Gate access2dNeeds info
Queue
Work orders in flight
RecordContextDueStatus
WO-9021Elevator PM / Midtown TowerTodayScheduled
WO-9014Roof patch / Lakeview Plaza1dIn progress
WO-9008Fire panel / East Ridge2dCloseout
Why It Lands
Every request keeps its full story attached.
RequestHawk keeps properties, people, vendors, approvals, and work orders connected from intake to closeout so teams move faster without losing context.
Full Story
Attached
Request
Issue, urgency, files
Property
Location and history
Person
Who reported it
Vendor
Scope and follow-through
Approval
Decision trail
Work Order
Execution and closeout
About RequestHawk
One platform to manage, analyze, and scale execution
RequestHawk gives managed property service teams one system to intake issues, triage requests, draft work orders, coordinate vendors, track progress, verify completion, and keep clients informed without juggling disconnected tools.
Requests
Structured intake instead of vague threads and phone follow-ups.
Vendors
Clear assignment, quote comparison, scheduling, and accountability.
Approvals
Cleaner decision paths before work moves downstream.
Closeout
Verified completion with notes, history, and client visibility intact.
Who It Helps
Built for teams running recurring maintenance operations
Best fit for operators managing request volume, vendor coordination, approvals, and closeout across multiple properties.
01
Property Management Companies
Run intake, vendors, approvals, and closeout without inbox sprawl.
02
HOAs & Condo Associations
Board-facing visibility without inbox-driven follow-up.
03
Multifamily Owners
Standardize execution across buildings, units, and vendors.
04
Commercial Property Operators
Coordinate higher-volume service work with clearer accountability.
How It Works
Get started in just a few structured steps
The goal is not to add more software ceremony. It is to give the team one usable operating surface for intake, routing, coordination, and closeout.
Start The ConversationOperational Throughput
MonthlyCoordinated jobs490.243
01
Capture And Triage
Turn calls, texts, and vague requests into structured records tied to the right property, person, and urgency.
02
Build Scope And Align Vendors
Organize quote review, vendor ownership, scheduling context, and approvals before the job becomes operational drift.
03
Track Execution And Closeout
Keep status, notes, verification, and stakeholder visibility connected through completion instead of scattered after the fact.
Packaging
Simple packaging for every operating stage
Start with a clear tier, then size the rollout around portfolio mix, workflow complexity, and implementation scope.
Starter Plan
$29.5
/ month
For smaller teams replacing inboxes and spreadsheets with one clean request workflow.
Includes
Request intake and triage
Core work-order coordination
Property, person, and organization records
Foundational reporting and visibility
Not Included
Vendor quote and approval routing
Advanced scheduling and closeout checkpoints
Implementation guidance for multi-team rollout
Most Popular
Pro Plan
$99.5
/ month
For operating teams that need approvals, vendors, and execution visible in one place.
Includes
Everything in Starter
Vendor coordination and approvals
Scheduling and closeout workflow
Linked operational history
Manager-facing execution visibility
Not Included
Dedicated rollout support for larger multi-team deployments
Expanded implementation planning sessions
Team Plan
$299
/ month
For higher-volume portfolios with multiple coordinators, stakeholders, and rollout needs.
Includes
Everything in Pro
Multi-team operating structure
Broader workflow coverage
Deeper reporting and accountability layers
Deployment support for higher coordination volume
Full workflow coverage, deeper reporting, and deployment support included.
Operator Signals
Built for teams that value operational clarity
The product pitch is straightforward: replace fragmented coordination with one operating layer that keeps intake, vendors, approvals, work, and closeout connected.
Requests / Vendors / Approvals / Closeout
Operations Lead, HOA Portfolio
“The value is not another dashboard. The value is finally being able to see where requests are stuck without hunting through five different channels.”
Property Services Coordinator
“RequestHawk feels like the system you wanted after the team outgrew email, shared notes, and one giant spreadsheet.”
Commercial Asset Team
“What stands out is the linked context. Opening a request and still having the property, people, and follow-through history in view changes how fast the team can act.”
FAQ
Questions before you book a demo?
What does RequestHawk replace?+
It replaces the fragmented operational layer made up of inboxes, texts, spreadsheets, and ad hoc follow-up. The goal is to move intake, vendor coordination, approvals, and closeout into one working system.
Is this a full property management platform?+
No. RequestHawk is not positioned as a full accounting suite or a generic property management platform. It is the operating layer around requests, work orders, vendors, approvals, scheduling, QA, and closeout.
Who is the best fit?+
Teams with recurring maintenance volume, multiple stakeholders, and enough vendor activity that coordination itself has become a real operational problem.
Why not use a generic CRM or field-service app?+
Generic tools usually force the team to rebuild context manually. RequestHawk is designed around the linked record model between organizations, properties, people, requests, and work orders so the execution story stays intact.
RequestHawk
Ready to replace inbox-driven operations?
If your team is tired of chasing vendors, cleaning up vague intake, and piecing execution together across disconnected tools, this is the part worth seeing live.